Last edited by Dijas
Wednesday, August 12, 2020 | History

3 edition of Tribal-state compact act of 1978 found in the catalog.

Tribal-state compact act of 1978

United States. Congress. Senate. Select Committee on Indian Affairs.

Tribal-state compact act of 1978

hearings before the United States Senate Select Committee on Indian Affairs, Ninety-fifth Congress, second session, on S. 2502 ... March 9 and 10, 1978

by United States. Congress. Senate. Select Committee on Indian Affairs.

  • 51 Want to read
  • 16 Currently reading

Published by U.S. Govt. Print. Off. in Washington .
Written in English

    Subjects:
  • Indians of North America -- Legal status, laws, etc,
  • Indians of North America -- Government relations

  • The Physical Object
    Paginationiv, 388 p. :
    Number of Pages388
    ID Numbers
    Open LibraryOL16812273M

    as altering, limiting, or extending any Federal or State law or Tribal-State compact prohibiting, permitting, or regulating gambling within the United States. ‘‘§ Definitions ‘‘For purposes of this subchapter, the following definitions shall apply: ‘‘(1) . (ii) the enforcement authorities specified in an applicable Tribal-State Compact negotiated under section 11 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. ) shall be carried out in accordance with that compact.

    (a) The tribal-state gaming compact entered into in accordance with the federal Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of (18 U.S.C. Secs. to , inclusive, and 25 U.S.C. Sec. et seq.) between the State of California and the Sycuan Band of the Kumeyaay Nation, executed on September 2, , is hereby ratified. The term does not include placing, receiving, or otherwise transmitting a bet or wager that is excluded from the definition of this term by the Act as an intrastate transaction or an intra-tribal transaction, and does not include any activity that is allowed under the Interstate Horseracing Act of (15 U.S.C. et seq.; see Sec. (a)).

    Tribal-State Compact Covering Indian Tribes in Minnesota; Operation of Class II Games; Allowance of Additional Year for Negotiations. Pub. L. –, title I, §, Oct. 23, , Stat. , provided that: “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the term ‘Class II gaming’ in Public Law – [25 U.S.C. et seq.], for. Regulatory Act of (25 U.S.C. 8 et seq.) (hereinafter "IGRA"), which permits Indian tribes to operate Class gaming activities on Indian reservations pursuant to a tribal-state compact entered into for that purpose; and WHEREAS, the Tribe presently operates gaming establishments on Indian lands in the.


Share this book
You might also like
Arid zone research and development

Arid zone research and development

Five year plan, 1978-83, Andhra Pradesh

Five year plan, 1978-83, Andhra Pradesh

Understanding child abuse and neglect

Understanding child abuse and neglect

Pioneer days in Plaster Rock

Pioneer days in Plaster Rock

The Egyptian agrarian reform: 1952-1962

The Egyptian agrarian reform: 1952-1962

Argyle diamond project

Argyle diamond project

Missouri. by Jeanne Zelten and Ardel Rueff

Missouri. by Jeanne Zelten and Ardel Rueff

St. Patricks Day souvenir commemorating the centennial of the Irish Rebellion 1798

St. Patricks Day souvenir commemorating the centennial of the Irish Rebellion 1798

Interparliamentary Union Conference, Belgrade, Yugoslavia

Interparliamentary Union Conference, Belgrade, Yugoslavia

Vermont and the environment.

Vermont and the environment.

Descendants of Sampson Stanfield, who went from Anson County, North Carolina, into Knox County, Kentucky, in the early 1800s, was son of John Stanfield and wife, Mary

Descendants of Sampson Stanfield, who went from Anson County, North Carolina, into Knox County, Kentucky, in the early 1800s, was son of John Stanfield and wife, Mary

Doctors in Elizabethan drama

Doctors in Elizabethan drama

North-west by south

North-west by south

Thermodynamic properties of copper and its inorganic compounds

Thermodynamic properties of copper and its inorganic compounds

Peregrine Falcon

Peregrine Falcon

Tribal-state compact act of 1978 by United States. Congress. Senate. Select Committee on Indian Affairs. Download PDF EPUB FB2

Tribal-state compact act of by United States. Congress. Senate. Select Committee on Indian Affairs.,U.S. Govt. Print. Off. edition, in EnglishPages: Get this from a library. Tribal-state compact act of hearings before the United States Senate, Select Committee on Indian Affairs, Ninety-fifth Congress, second Session, on S.

March 9 [United States. Congress. Senate. Select Committee on Indian Affairs.]. Get this from a library. Tribal-state compact act: report to accompany S. [United States. Congress. Senate. Select Committee on Indian Affairs.]. TRIBAL-STATE COMPACT ACT OF Hearings before the United States Senate Select Committee on Indian Affairs [United States Senate, Ninety-Fifth Congress, Second Session] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers.

TRIBAL-STATE COMPACT ACT OF Hearings before the United States Senate Select Committee on Indian AffairsAuthor: Second Session United States Senate, Ninety-Fifth Congress.

Tribal-State Compacts Tribal-state compact act of 1978 book declared necessary for any Class III gaming on reservations under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of (IGRA). They were designed to allow tribal and state governments to come to a "business" agreement.

A compact can be thought of as "negotiated agreement between two political entities that resolves questions of overlapping jurisdictional. An early example is the Indian Child Welfare Act of (92 St. ) that permitted tribal governments to transfer authority to appropriate state agencies to.

Gaming Regulatory Act of Octo (Public Law ), 25 U.S.C. gt ("IGRA"). The terms of this Compact are unique to this Tribe and reflect the fact that the lands that are the subject of this Compact are subject to IGRA.

SECTION 1. TITLE. This Compact is entered into this - day of,by and between. Regulatory Act (heremafter "IGRA"), Public LawStat.25 U.S.C.

Sections to () creating a mechanism through which the several States and Indian tribal governments may allocate jurisdiction and control of Class III gaminghas operated Class III video games of chance pursuant to a Tribal-State Compact.

“Act”) which requires a tribal-state compact negotiated between a tribe and a state in order to conduct Class III Gaming Activities on the Indian Lands of a tribe; and WHEREAS, the purpose of the Act is to provide a statutory basis for the operation of gaming byFile Size: KB.

Gaming Regulatory Act (“IGRA”); and WHEREAS, the State and the Tribe agree that all terms of this amendment to the Compact (collectively the “Amended Compact”) are intended to be binding and enforceable. NOW, THEREFORE, the Tribe and the State hereby amend the Compact as follows: I. REVENUE CONTRIBUTION.

This Tribal-State Gaming Compact is entered into on a government-to-government basis by and between the *1, a federally-recognized sovereign Indian tribe (hereafter "Tribe"), and the State of California, a sovereign State of the United States (hereafter "State"), pursuant to the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of (P.L.codified at law the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, Pub.L.

25 U.S.C. s, & sea., which provides in part that a tribal-state Compact may be negotiated between a Tribe and a State to govern the conduct of certain gaming activities which constitute Class gaming for purposes of the Act on the Indian lands of the Tribe within the State; and.

Regulatory Act of (P.L. codified at 25 U.S.C. § et seq. and 18 U.S.C. §§ ) (IGRA), and any successor statute or amendments. WHEREAS, inthe Tribe and the State entered into the "Tribal-State Compact between the State of California and the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians" ( Compact), which.

THIS COMPACT is entered into pursuant to the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act ofP.L. codified at 25 USC Section et seq., and 18 USC Section et seq. ("I.G.R.A." or "the Act").

PARTIES THIS TRIBAL-STATE COMPACT is. The Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria (the “ Tribe”), a federally recognized Indian tribe listed in the Federal Register as the Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria, California, and the State of California (the “State”) enter into this tribal-state compact pursuant to the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of (“IGRA”).

PREAMBLEFile Size: 1MB. TRIBAL-STATE COMPACT FOR CONTROL OF CLASS III VIDEO GAMES OF CHANCE ON THE LEECH LAKE RESERVATION IN MINNESOTA This Compact is made this 6th day of June,by and between the State of Minnesota (hereinafter "State") and the Leech Lake Band of Chippewa Indians, (hereinafter "Tribe").File Size: KB.

TRIBAL-STATE COMPACT FOR CONTROL OF CLASS I11 VIDEO GAMES OF CHANCE ON THE LEECH LAKE RESERVATION IN MINNESOTA This Compact is made this 6th day of June,by and between the State of Minnesota (hereinafter "State") and the Leech Lake Band of Chippewa Indians, (hereinafter "Tribe").

The State is acting through its Governor and the. The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of requires that tribes sign negotiated compacts, or agreements, in good faith, with their state governments to clarify a range of jurisdictional issues surrounding regulation and scope of gaming.

Each compact must be negotiated with the Governor, ratified by the State Legislature, and finally, approved by the Department of.

§ When should the Indian Tribe or State submit a compact or amendment for review and approval. § What documents must be submitted with a compact or amendment.

§ Where should a compact or amendment be submitted for review and approval. § How long will the Secretary take to review a compact or amendment. referred to as the “Tribe”) executed a Class III Gaming Compact pursuant to the Indian Gaming.

Regulatory Act (IGRA) ofP.L.codified at 25 USC Section et seq. and 18 USC Sectionand WHEREAS, the Class III Gaming Compact executed by the State and the Tribe, as well. (a) For the purposes of this section, “tribe” means the Mohegan Tribe of Indians of Connecticut and “compact” means the Tribal-State Compact between the tribe and the state of Connecticut, dated (b) The expenses of administering the provisions of the compact shall be financed as provided in this section.Tribe (“Tribe”) executed a Class III Gaming Compact (“Compact”), pursuant to the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of (“IGRA”), P.L.codified at 25 U.S.C.

Section et. seq. and 18 U.S.C. Sections ; and. WHEREAS, the Class III Gaming Compact executed by the State and the Tribe, as well.In Congress passed the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA).

It was intended as a federal mandate to those involved in the child custody system to work collaboratively with tribes to prevent the breakup of Indian families and tribes and to redress past wrongs of the American child custody Size: KB.